Candidate for Councillor Ward 1
This candidate hasn’t listed a campaign website or social account with the Town. That says nothing about them as a candidate — it just means less of their material is published online for us to summarise.
Every candidate in this race is shown against the same 16 issues, in the same order, whether or not we’ve found something for each one. Why we do it this way.
Will I be able to afford to live here?
Support appropriate housing and investment where infrastructure exists, respecting neighbourhood character.
“Support appropriate housing and investment where adequate infrastructure exists while respecting neighbourhood character.”
Confidence:High
What happens to my tax bill, and where does the money go?
Hold taxes at or below inflation and demand value for every tax dollar.
“Taxes at or below inflation. Value for every tax dollar.”
Confidence:High
When I call for help, will it come fast enough?
Use prevention, enforcement and data to improve community safety and keep streets safe.
“Use prevention, enforcement and data to improve community safety and keep our streets safe.”
Confidence:High
Can I get where I need to go without driving?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Will decisions be made in the open, and will anyone answer for them?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Will the things I use every day actually get fixed?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Will our main streets and local jobs thrive?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Is the candidate protecting the nature we live in?
Maintain clean parks and recreation spaces with independent, responsive Ward 1 representation.
“Maintain clean parks and recreation spaces while providing independent, responsive representation that delivers results for Ward 1.”
Confidence:High
Will there be a doctor and a hospital when we need one?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
How fast should we grow, and who decides what gets built where?
Judge growth projects on planning merit, infrastructure capacity, traffic, drainage and compatibility.
“Growth should not be treated as inherently positive or negative; individual projects should be evaluated on planning merit, infrastructure capacity, traffic, drainage, compatibility and community impact.”
Confidence:High
Who looks after the most vulnerable residents?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Can I walk and bike safely around town?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Does the candidate value what makes this place feel alive?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Should energy-hungry data centres be welcomed here?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Is our drinking water safe and our waste handled?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Are the rules fair, and are they actually enforced?
Not reviewed yet. Know something?
Candidates and members of the public can both report a correction. Every one is logged and answered, and corrections about a candidate’s own positions get priority.